Airports – ITRANSPORTE https://www.revistaitransporte.com TRANSPORT ENGINEERING & CONSULTANCY Thu, 07 Apr 2022 15:24:30 +0000 en-GB hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.4 Airports: where’s my suitcase? https://www.revistaitransporte.com/airports-wheres-my-suitcase/ Sun, 03 Apr 2022 22:03:34 +0000 https://www.revistaitransporte.com/?p=5198

checking in our suitcase

The big day is finally here! It’s time for us to fly. We leave everything neat and tidy at home, pick up our suitcase, and head to the airport. When we get to the terminal, we make our way to the check-in desk, where we witness the first stage in the journey taken by our baggage: tagging.

The tag serves to identify our baggage in the BHS, and normally consists of a sticker bearing a series of printed details and a barcode. This sticker is usually wrapped around the handle of our suitcase. The barcode, by the way, is a unique reference and ensures that every item of baggage has its own exclusive identification code.

In addition to the tag, at the same check-in desk the size and weight of our suitcase is checked automatically. After the tag has been attached, and provided the suitcase is within the permitted dimensions, it enters the BHS.

BHS stands for Automated Baggage Handling System, and comprises a series of elements that convey our baggage automatically from the check-in desk to the point of delivery to the handling agents, who are responsible for loading it onto the plane. (See Figure 1).

BHS. A series of elements that convey our baggage automatically from the check-in desk to the point of delivery to the handling agents.

Our suitcase makes its way into the BHS

Our suitcase enters the system via a series of automated conveyor belts. It leaves the airport’s check-in area and is taken to a technical and rather industrial area within the same building. The suitcase is now one of many that are currently within the system, and are being conveyed in an orderly fashion along the multitude of conveyor belts that snake their way through the facility.

The BHS controls the progress of the baggage using Programmable Logic Controllers, or PLCs. These devices govern various elements within the system, including the motors that move the conveyor belts, and decide whether to start or stop each motor based on the prevailing conditions within the system at the time.

Our suitcase continues to make its way along the conveyor belts and soon passes through a gate, which is fitted with several strategically positioned laser barcode readers. This gate is known as the Automatic Tag Reader (ATR).

Scanner arches enable the BHS to identify the suitcase by reading the barcode that has been attached to it. Once it has been identified, the BHS assigns the suitcase a final destination within the system. It should be noted that the BHS is able to distinguish between suitcases based on the flight they correspond to, thereby ensuring that baggage for the same flight is delivered to the same end point (i.e. the make-up carousels).

At no point has our suitcase stopped in order to be identified as it made its way through the Automatic Tag Reader. The transit process is continuous, except for a couple of occasions when the system stopped the suitcase at a junction, so that an item of baggage from another line ahead of us could join the belt.

Ineco is currently working on the design of the BHS for the international airports of Schiphol (Amsterdam), pictured, and Dammam (Saudi Arabia). / PHOTO_INECO

Baggage inspection

All of the baggage that enters the BHS is inspected, in order to ensure the safety and security of people, aircraft and the airport facilities. Our suitcase continues to make its way along the conveyor belts, heading towards a large machine in the distance that appears to be swallowing up all of the baggage in front. This is the baggage screening machine.

Baggage screening machines examine every single item of baggage that enters the BHS. They are equipped with advanced technological features designed to detect elements that might cause harm to people and property, such as weapons and explosives.

A small curtain marks the point where the inspection process begins. As with the identification process, our suitcase does not stop during the inspection process, and after a few seconds it emerges from the machine and passes through a second curtain before continuing its journey through the facility.

At the end of the inspection, the machine sends the result to the BHS, which incorporates this result into the data it has for the item of baggage in question. This data is vital, as the BHS must ensure that the only suitcases to reach the planes are those that have been ‘cleared’ (i.e. they have passed the inspection).

So, with the inspection result now linked to its data file, our suitcase continues on towards a critical decision-making point in the system. Here, there is an electromechanical device that separates the ‘cleared’ baggage from the rest, sending it along one belt and the ‘non-cleared’ baggage along another.

At this decision point, the BHS is able to verify the inspection status of each item of baggage. If –and only if– a suitcase’s status is shown as ‘cleared’, the system will allow it to continue on towards the final destination. In all other cases, the system will divert the baggage so that an additional inspection can be carried out.

As our suitcase does not contain any dangerous items, it was ‘cleared’ during the first inspection and can now make its way to the final destination. Behind it, at the decision point, other suitcases that were not so lucky are diverted onto a different line, where they will be subjected to a new inspection.

Early baggage storage line with stacker crane operation, Alicante airport. / PHOTO_JOAQUÍN ESTEVE

 Baggage classification and final destination

Because it classifies baggage by flight, the BHS helps to make airport operations more efficient. Our suitcase is now nearing the end of its journey. The line it is now travelling on has a multitude of junctions leading off to different locations, such as early baggage storage, manual encoding stations, make-up carousels, and docks for ‘problem’ baggage.

Early baggage storage is a temporary destination for baggage that has been introduced into the system but whose flight does not yet have an assigned make-up carousel. It is a sub-system that is of tremendous help to airports that handle high volumes of baggage for connecting flights, when there can be a difference of many hours between the arrival and departure flights.

Our suitcase continues on past the entrances to the manual encoding stations, as the BHS has not lost track of it at any point. It also goes past the entrance to early baggage storage: the make-up carousel for our flight is now ready to receive baggage, so there is no need to store the suitcase within the system temporarily. When our suitcase reaches the junction for the make-up carousel assigned to our flight, the system activates a switch to send it along the right track. During this final stage in its journey, the baggage is carefully deposited onto the make-up carousel.

Make-up carousels are electromechanical elements that form a closed circuit, into which all the baggage for a particular flight is deposited. The baggage trains are positioned alongside the make-up carousels, in order make the process of loading the baggage onto the trains as efficient as possible.

Once the suitcase has reached the make-up carousel, it is out of the hands of the BHS and becomes the responsibility of the handling agent. Via the baggage train, the agents transport our suitcase to the plane and load it into the hold. Sometimes, if we look through the plane window, we can see this process taking place.

Summary and final thoughts

Figure 2 shows the processes that a suitcase passes through after it has been checked in.

DIAGRAM OF AN OUTBOUND BAGGAGE SYSTEM. This diagram shows all of the processes that a suitcase passes through, from its arrival at the check-in desk to the final destination of the loading dock, where it passes out of the hands of the BHS and becomes the responsibility of the handling agents.

The BHS has a number of technical solutions, contains many more elements and carries out many more processes than those described in this article. Ineco is aware of this complexity and takes the specific nature of each project into account. This enables the company to provide tailored services for the domestic and international markets.

BHS: a key role in baggage handling

Roberto Calonge, industrial engineer at Ineco and an expert in BHS and ORAT

Baggage Handling Systems (BHS) are among the most complex and extensive facilities within the airport terminal. Their transport systems can reach extreme lengths (for example, the BHS line at Terminal 4 in Adolfo Suárez-Madrid-Barajas Airport is over 80 kilometres long, while the line at Terminal 1 in Josep Tarradellas-Barcelona-El Prat Airport is over 20 kilometres long), while some systems can process more than 5,000 items of baggage in a single hour. Moreover, the constituent elements of the system extend to almost every level and area within the terminal building.

The dimensions of the system are so staggering that industry experts often describe an airport terminal as an BHS with a building on top. Hyperbole aside, an BHS plays a key role in handling checked baggage and is designed to ensure that each passenger’s suitcase is loaded into the hold of the correct plane on time and is delivered to the passenger as quickly as possible at the destination airport, while observing all of the necessary security procedures along the way. 

In all of the terminal design projects in which it has taken part, Ineco has addressed the need to design an BHS (in terms of both transportation system layout and technology) that is adapted to suit the specific operating needs of each airport. For example, the design of an BHS for a hub airport such as Schiphol focuses on minimising the processing time for baggage on connecting flights, in order to ensure that those with a short space of time between flights (‘hot transfer bags’) are processed quickly, while those with longer connection times are temporarily placed in an early baggage storage (EBS) until they can be made-up for the flight, i.e. loaded onto baggage trains or placed in containers to be taken from the terminal building to the plane. 

In the case of Schiphol, a combination of transportation technologies were chosen: conveyor belts for baggage that does not need to be transferred between terminals, and an ICS (Independent Carrier System) for baggage that does, as an ICS allows for greater speed and tracking precision than a conveyor belt system. In contrast, for an origin/destination airport such as Kastelli on the island of Crete, the design focuses on minimising the transportation time between the check-in desks and the make-up carousels. 

Designing a successful BHS –and the success of the baggage handling process as a whole– always hinges on understanding the interests of the actors involved. The following two examples help to illustrate this point: at Rosalía de Castro-Santiago de Compostela Airport, it is necessary to provide automated transportation for bicycles between the check-in desk and the baggage train area, as bicycles are a mode of transport used by pilgrims. Meanwhile, at Costa del Sol-Málaga Airport, it is necessary to provide transportation for golf bags, as golf is one of the activities that draws visitors to the area.

The future of the industry will involve new baggage identification and tracking systems, which may even use computer vision and artificial intelligence

When designing airport terminals, Ineco –which has a team of BHS experts– takes the operation as a whole into account, in order to ensure that the needs and expectations of the actors involved are satisfied in full. The baggage handling process at an airport is an example of a supply chain in which various organisations are responsible for particular parts. Consequently, efficient design throughout the transportation chain –and especially for the interfaces between sub-systems– is vital in order to ensure that every item of baggage is delivered to its owner without unnecessary delays at the destination.

The design of an BHS must therefore enable the efficient transportation of baggage while minimising capital expenditure and the costs of operating and maintaining the system. It must also ensure that the system is available almost 100% of the time, and that the baggage is transported to the correct make-up carousel. In order to achieve this latter aim, a high degree of precision is required to identify each item of baggage (by reading the data on its tag) and track it as it moves through the facility before final delivery to the make-up carousel.

For the ramp handling companies, which are responsible for loading the baggage onto the carts and containers, transporting it to the aircraft and loading it into the hold (and vice versa), the operational logic of the BHS must take the working requirements of each company into account. For example, one company may require that flight make-up begins 120 minutes before departure, while another requires that it begins 150 minutes before departure. It is also necessary to ensure an ergonomic design for the baggage loading and unloading operations. 

Lastly, hold baggage represents an important part of an airline’s business, as passengers may have to pay for each item of checked baggage. (This can be an extremely important factor for airlines that follow a low-cost model.) Baggage that is not delivered to the passenger at the destination airport has a high cost for the airline, as locating and sending the baggage to the passenger’s home can multiply by a factor of 10 the amount of work needed to transport baggage under normal conditions; additionally, there is the risk of losing the passenger as a customer for future flights. 

The baggage handling industry is an extremely dynamic one, undergoing constant evolution in order to introduce new technologies that can help to deliver baggage to the passenger at the destination airport as efficiently and cost-effectively as possible, while minimising the environmental impact. Ineco has been a witness to (and continues to take part in) this evolution and has worked on each stage of a number of BHS projects: process planning and drawing up the basic and detailed designs for the system; developing the technical specifications and bid assessment criteria; monitoring and supervising construction; Operational Readiness and Airport Transfer (ORAT), including the development of operating and contingency procedures; operational testing and monitoring, maintenance, and process reengineering.

At present, the industry is undergoing a revolution in terms of the technologies and business models used, which Ineco is able to introduce into its designs when necessary. Noteworthy examples include:

  • Obligatory baggage tracking at a minimum of four points (check-in, loading onto the aircraft, unloading at the transfer area, and delivery to the passenger), in accordance with IATA Resolution 753.
  • The gradual implementation of baggage identification and tracking using RFID technology (as IATA has indicated to its members) and OCR identification, both of which are designed to support the traditional process of identification and tracking by reading the barcodes on the bag tags. Some companies are even developing identification and tracking processes based on computer vision and artificial intelligence.
  • The extension of the baggage handling process beyond the airport, with check-in and final delivery taking place off-terminal, so that passengers do not need to hand over or pick up their baggage at the terminal.
  • The introduction of self-service models for both baggage check-in and delivery to the passenger at their final destination.
  • The use of XML-based messaging between the BHS and the airlines’ DCS systems, in order to make communication between the two systems more reliable.
  • Automation of the tasks of loading and unloading baggage, including autonomous vehicles thereby reducing the risk of injury to the handling agents when they perform these tasks. 
  • Providing passengers with real-time information on the status of their baggage via the airlines’ own apps.

The emerging ideas that are being developed in the industry, and which Ineco is following with a view to incorporating them into its projects, include the de-linking of the itineraries of the passenger and their baggage, in order to make better use of aircraft hold space; the use of e-commerce distribution networks within cities to transport baggage from the passenger’s home to the airport terminal, and vice versa; and the possibility of processing hold baggage at air cargo terminals.

The company has a team of experts that specialise in BHS and airport baggage handling, with extensive experience of projects at varying scales and with different operational requirements. The team has worked with a variety of technologies and business models and has the capacity to design the most efficient handling system for each airport, including BHS.

The new baggage identification and tracking systems (including those that use computer vision and artificial intelligence), automation, and the extension of the check-in and delivery processes off-terminal, are just some of the examples of the revolution that the industry is currently undergoing.

]]>
Kasteli takes off in Crete https://www.revistaitransporte.com/kasteli-takes-off-in-crete/ Sun, 04 Apr 2021 22:09:52 +0000 https://www.revistaitransporte.com/?p=4600

Following the opening of the new Athens airport, located approximately 30 kilometres from the capital in Spata, in 2001, and the opening up of the remaining airports to public-private management starting in 2015, the next big project for Greek aviation is the construction of the new airport in Kasteli in Crete, which will replace the airport in the capital, Heraklion. With an initial capacity of 8.9 million passengers, it will be Greece’s second largest airport, after Athens. According to the Greek government, this new infrastructure project will generate approximately 7,500 direct jobs once completed, plus another 37,000 indirect jobs in the tourism and commerce sectors.

Heraklion International Airport, is a joint venture between the Greek firm GEK Terna and India’s GMR Airports Limited (GAL), which were awarded the concession contract in 2019. Ineco is developing the design of the new airport for the construction company Terna, which has a period of five years to carry out the works following the signing of the contract, which took place in February 2020. In addition, during the pre-bid phase, the company also drew up the Master Plan for the future airport, which will occupy an area of approximately 600 hectares.

Air transport generates 457,000 jobs in Greece and contributes 17.8 billion euros to its economy, equivalent to 10.2% of Greek GDP, according to a study by IATA, the International Air Transport Association. It is closely linked to tourism, which also accounts for more than 10% of national GDP. Having weathered a long period of recession, the Greek economy returned to positive growth beginning in 2017, which is reflected in airport traffic, which, according to the Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority, recorded a record 65.4 million passengers in 2019, 3 million more than the previous year, an increase of 5 percent. The total number of flights also increased by 3.7%.

Greece broke its tourism record in 2019, with more than 31.3 million visitors, 18% of whom, more than 5 million, travelled to the island of Crete, the country’s largest island and the fifth largest in the Mediterranean. With a population of just over 634,000 inhabitants and covering an area of around 8,500 km2, it is one of the five most visited Greek destinations: its thousands of years of history, cultural and monumental heritage, the Mediterranean climate and the island’s beautiful landscapes and beaches are its main attractions. It is also an important geostrategic enclave due to its location. The local economy is mainly based on agriculture and tourism.

The island has three airport facilities, all located along the northern coast: the small airfield in Sitia, and two international airports, Chania, which was used by 2.9 million passengers in 2019 and shares its installations with a military base, and the Nikos Kazantzakis airport in Heraklion, the island’s capital and the fourth largest city in Greece, with a population of just over 313,000 inhabitants, in the central area of the island, which is also used for both civilian and military purposes.

Activity has been on the rise in recent years, with a steady increase in traffic reaching 8 million passengers in 2019. Today’s installations date back to 1972 and were expanded in 1996 and 2005, although they become particularly congested in summer. In addition to the three civilian airports, 39 kilometres southeast of Heraklion is the Hellenic Air Force base at Kasteli, next to the location of the new airport.

The construction of other major energy and transport infrastructures on the island is also being planned, involving a total investment of more than 3.1 billion euros and with the financial backing of the European Union: the roughly 180-kilometre VOAK highway, which will connect Chania with the town of Agios Nikolaos, and two power supply interconnections with the Greek mainland: Crete-Attica and Crete-Peloponnese.

What Crete’s new airport will look like

The designs currently being developed by Ineco include the following general specifications:

1. Airfield 

  • The runway, class 4E, CAT I, will be 3,200 metres long by 60 metres wide, including margins, plus RESAs (Runway End Safety Areas) at both ends. The existing runway at Heraklion airport has a maximum length of 2,682 metres, meaning that the new facility will be able to accommodate larger aircraft.
  • In terms of taxiways, there will be one parallel to the runway, several rapid exit taxiways and connecting taxiways to the nearby military airport. A connection to an isolated post is also included.
  • The aircraft parking apron will have five MARS positions connected by boarding bridges from the terminal building for class E aircraft, each including two positions for class C aircraft, one remote MARS for class E aircraft, including two for class C. In addition, there are remote positions for class C aircraft, general aviation stands and helicopter stands. The platform will also have a hydrant network supplying all class C and E stands, as well as 400Hz connection points at each of these positions.
  • Pavement will be rigid on the apron, at taxiway intersections and on the first 450 metres from the runway thresholds, and flexible on the runway and taxiways.
  • The designs also include the rest of the airfield’s infrastructure and associated facilities, such as the fire station building, perimeter road and fencing, hydrocarbon separators, lighting, flood barrier and containment basin, firefighter test platform, etc.

2. Land side 

  • The terminal building will occupy an area of between 85,000 and 90,000 m2, divided into four floors: basement, arrivals floor, departures floor and a floor for installations and other purposes.
  • The terminal’s façade will be 200 metres long. The arrivals floor is at apron and land side car park level, while the check-in floor is accessed via a departure deck that is 7.5 metres above ground level.
  • The check-in system will include four islands, with around 80 counters. Security checkpoints, passport control stations and contact boarding gates have been designed on the first floor and remote boarding on the ground floor (both for Schengen and non-Schengen flights).
  • A large area of more than 10,000 m2 has been planned for commercial space, as well as a general aviation hall and another for authorities, among other facilities. The building will qualify for LEED SILVER certification.
  • The main part of the control tower, with the beacon housed at the top, will be approximately 45 metres high and will consist of six floors plus the antenna field.
  • Auxiliary buildings will also be designed: industrial buildings, such as the power station, the power supply substation, a sewage treatment plant, a clean disposal point, a drinking water plant, an installation maintenance building, a handling building, fuel plant, etc. Other buildings include the police station on the land side and the access control buildings on the air side.
  • A surface car park covering approximately 45,000 m2 has been planned to accommodate private vehicles as well as taxis and buses.
  • In terms of road access, a four-lane commercial artery with two main roundabouts is being designed, which will connect to the new highway linking Heraklion to the airport. All of the airport’s internal roads are also being planned.

An island of legend

Crete is the cradle of Europe’s oldest civilisation, the Minoan civilisation (7000 BC), which left its mark with the ruins of the partially reconstructed Palace of Knossos, one of the island’s most important tourist attractions, visited by half a million people every year. Located just 5 kilometres from Heraklion, its complex design is associated with the myth of the maze built by Daedalus for King Minos –son of the god Zeus and the princess Europa, whom he abducted and took to Crete– in order to imprison the bloodthirsty Minotaur, his stepson. In turn, after falling out with Minos, Daedalus devised wings made of bird feathers bound with wax to fly away from the island with his son Icarus. According to the myth, despite his father’s warnings, Icarus ascended too high and the heat of the sun melted the wax, causing him to fall into the sea. In the picture: the Venetian fortress of Koules in the port of Heraklion.

]]>
Two decades on the African continent https://www.revistaitransporte.com/two-decades-on-the-african-continent/ Sun, 04 Apr 2021 22:05:57 +0000 https://www.revistaitransporte.com/?p=4560

Africa was the location of one of Ineco’s first projects abroad: in 1975, the company, then a small consultancy firm made up of a small group of engineers from Renfe, was preparing a feasibility study for the Kindu-Kisangani railway line in the former Zaire, now the Democratic Republic of Congo. Ineco, which began its aeronautical operations in Africa in the early 2000s, has carried out projects to improve and expand airport infrastructure, navigation systems and airspace management in various countries across the continent. One particularly noteworthy example, due to its condition as a group of islands, is Cape Verde, where Ineco has carried out numerous projects.

A study of the procedures and modes of operation at the São Filipe aerodrome on the island of Fogo is currently underway. Ineco is preparing a review of obstacles and safety in relation to the introduction of night operations and instrument flight conditions, and is designing the instrument flight procedures. Another recent project in the archipelago was a study, carried out in 2019, for the installation of an ILS (Instrument Landing System) at São Vicente’s Cesaria Évora airport, one of the country’s four international airports.

Members of the Ineco team at the opening of the new Boa Vista airport terminal (2007).

The first projects in Cape Verde date back to 2003, with the project and management of the new Boa Vista international airport, which opened in 2007. Since then, a large number of studies, projects and supervision of subsequent improvement works have been carried out. These include the review of the master plans of Sal, Boa Vista, Praia and São Vicente, in 2012, easement studies, technical and economic feasibility analysis of night operation in Boa Vista and São Vicente. In 2014, ASA also commissioned Ineco to draw up the master plans for three domestic airports: Maio, Sâo Nicolau and Fogo, and between 2015 and 2018, the management of the expansion of the passenger terminals at the international airports of Boa Vista and Sal.

Ineco has also carried out its aeronautical activity on the African continent in a half-dozen other countries. In 2015, it worked on updating the air traffic management system for the state-owned Airports of Mozambique (ADM). The company provided support services for the design of ATM systems in the specification of equipment and systems and also provided support for their subsequent deployment.

In 2012, as a result of an intergovernmental collaboration agreement between Spain and Angola, Ineco formed part of the Aena Internacional team that, over the course of a year, developed physical and operational security procedures for the airport of Luanda, the country’s capital. Airport staff were also trained and a quality assurance plan was introduced using indicators, similar to the one applied by Aena at its airports.

In Morocco, between 2011 and 2012, Ineco was part of the consortium that carried out the Study, analysis and reorganisation of Morocco’s airspace project that was included in the country’s Strategic Plan to boost its tourism industry. At the same time, the company carried out a capacity study for the Moroccan Directorate General of Civil Aviation for the Mohammed V airport terminal building in Casablanca.

Ineco’s first project in Egypt was awarded in an international tender in 2010, when the Egyptian Company for Airports and Air Navigation (EHCAAN) selected the company to develop a strategic plan for the country’s civil aviation. The plan included an analysis of the CNS/ATM infrastructure, the proposal of a new airway network, the definition of a modernisation plan for navigation systems and the development of specifications for a new air traffic control system for the Cairo Control Centre.

In 2009, in Kenya, the company reviewed and updated the expansion project of the Jomo Kenyatta airport in Nairobi. Due to the strong growth in traffic volume up to that point, the airport operator had to revise its planned expansion project. This plan was opened to international tender and awarded to Ineco in 2008. Works included a traffic demand forecast through 2030, the computer simulation of passenger, baggage and aircraft flows –both of the airport’s current situation and future forecasts– and the assessment and proposal of recommendations to optimise the capacity and functional, economic-financial, architectural and operational safety viability of the expansion project.

In 2009, Ineco designed the improvement and extension of the airfield at Walvis Bay airport for the Namibian Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure, for which it also drafted the basic project for a new passenger terminal.

The potential of the African market

Now well into the 21st century, air transport, linked primarily to the growth of tourism, has proved vital to many African economies. In November 2019, the ICAO noted “the crucial importance” of air transport liberalisation in Africa for the achievement of the sustainable development goals of the UN 2030 Agenda, as well as its role as a driver of employment, capable of generating “9.8 million jobs by 2036”, although already in 2018 it estimated that “due to the recent and effective liberalisation of air transport globally, many airport hubs in Africa will be saturated by 2020”. It further noted that “the growth of air traffic in this continent can only be sustainable if the aviation infrastructure in the region is optimised”.

Even with these challenges, the potential of the African aviation sector, which was already showing positive signs before the health crisis, is strong. Forecasts by organisations such as the International Monetary Fund suggest that from 2021 onwards, in emerging and developing countries, which have suffered a “less severe” economic impact from the pandemic, GDP will grow by more than 5%, more than the averages for the world and the large advanced economies.

]]>
Keeping wildlife at bay at airports https://www.revistaitransporte.com/keeping-wildlife-at-bay-at-airports/ https://www.revistaitransporte.com/keeping-wildlife-at-bay-at-airports/#respond Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:06:52 +0000 http://www.revistaitransporte.com/?p=3207

Focal points of wildlife attraction (water points, landfills, dovecotes, etc.), favourable habitat environments in airports and their adjacent areas, aspects related to bird migration or any other circumstances that encourage the presence and concentration of wildlife in and around airports must be properly managed to prevent conflicts with aircraft operations.

Aena, as an airport manager, implements measures at its aerodromes to monitor and control wildlife populations in order to reduce the risk of animal strikes. These are implemented in accordance with the regulations of technical guides produced by the Spanish Aviation Safety and Security Agency (AESA), in particular CERA-09-GUI-001 for the preparation of Airport Manual AUP-17-ITC-113 Preparation of wildlife and habitat studies in airport environments and CSA-14-IT-025-1.0 Special technical instruction for the drafting of airport wildlife strike risk studies.

Ineco has produced information guides describing the most common birds for Aena’s staff at the airports of El Hierro and Jerez (pictured). / PHOTO_ MIKEBERT4 (FLICKR)

Airports and heliports, in turn, manage risks by implementing the guidelines in these guides, as established by Procedure 4.12 of the Airport Manual and in the respective wildlife control programmes. The scope of use includes aerodromes covered by Commission Regulation (EU) No 139/2014 of 12 February 2014, which establishes aerodrome requirements and administrative procedures in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the Parliament and of the Council, and by Royal Decree 862/2009 of 14 May, which approves the technical standards for the design and operation of aerodromes for public use and the certification and verification regulation for airports and other aerodromes for public use.

In order to manage wildlife, it is necessary to implement methodologies that provide data for understanding basic population dynamics, habitat selection and movements within the airport

Within this context, since April 2017, Ineco has provided technical assistance to Aena for the implementation and monitoring of programmes that offer different alternatives for wildlife population management at airports. The company has also drafted training documents to help staff at certain airports to identify species and improve the reporting of sightings of birds that could interfere with air operations.

Wildlife monitoring methodologies

In order to manage wildlife populations, it is essential to implement methodologies that provide data for understanding basic population dynamics, habitat selection and wildlife movements, mainly of birds, within the airport. Ineco’s technical assistance includes the implementation of methodologies for the monitoring of wildlife based on basic parameters related to abundance, density, distribution, flows and sampling of focal points of attraction in order to assess their significance in terms of potential risk of collisions with aircraft. Census methodologies for birds and mammals are currently being designed in compliance with AESA’s instructions. The idea is to carry out repeatable and comparable standardised samplings over time to enable analysis of the evolution of animal populations and determination of wildlife flows/movements that could affect operations.

Since 2017, Ineco has been providing technical assistance to Aena to implement and monitor programmes that offer different alternatives for wildlife population management at airports

The target animal groups are diverse and their significance varies depending on the airport, but they are essentially birds and mammals. Mammals may pose a risk to operations as in the case of ungulates (roe deer and wild boar) or may cause strikes because they themselves constitute focal points of attraction by representing a food source for other animals such as birds of prey. This is the case with lagomorphs –small herbivorous mammals such as hares and rabbits– a group on which work is being carried out to develop methods of monitoring and control in places with this type of problem, through standardised censuses and population control protocols.

Habitat management

To a large extent, control of wildlife at airports involves adequate habitat management. Airport habitats should be as unattractive as possible to wildlife. It is important to identify elements that attract wildlife, such as plant species that encourage nesting, feeding and shelter, the presence of roosting spaces, puddles etc. Different technical notes have also been developed regarding the application of new vegetation cover using hydroseeding or, for example, responses to airports about the suitability of the implementation of certain vegetation cover in the airport environment, analysing its suitability and proposing alternative crops that are less attractive because of reduced palatability or method of cultivation.

Relocation of a white stork’s nest away from Huesca-Pirineos Airport

The presence of nests of certain species in airport environments can pose a significant risk to airport operations, either by the birds being run over, struck or sucked into aircraft engines.

In the specific case of Huesca-Pirineos Airport, the presence of a white stork’s nest in the municipality of Alcalá del Obispo could have interfered with airport operations, so the airport applied for a permit through the Aragonese Institute of Environmental Management (INAGA) to remove it and implement deterrents and corrective measures. Three types of actions were carried out in compliance with the resolution issued by the INAGA:

  1. Removal of nests: removal of the nest using cranes and/or climbing equipment.
  2. Deterrence: installation of measures to deter reoccupation of the church. The chosen measure was the placement of low-voltage electrified cables that are harmless to the storks, but prevent them from perching and rebuilding the nest.
  3. Alternative corrective measures: an alternative nesting platform will be installed in a location that does not affect the airport.

Training guides

In order to improve the reporting of sightings and incidents at airports such as El Hierro and Jerez, a number of guides have been produced describing the most common birds that pose a risk due to their size and weight. The aim is to train airport staff to better identify these species, particularly birds, on the air side of the airport.

In the case of El Hierro Airport, located on the coast of the island of El Hierro in the Canary Islands, there is a notable presence of seabirds, as well as other species associated with aquatic and grassland environments. The guide lists the 16 most relevant birds in regard to aviation safety, and includes their movement patterns, distinguishing features for identification, conservation status and the periods of the year in which they can be observed.

Jerez International Airport, which handled one million passengers in 2017, an increase of 14.1%, has had a wildlife control service for a number of years. It uses various methods for deterring, capturing and repelling wildlife. The guide is used to train students at the Jerez Pilot School to enable them to identify which wildlife poses a risk and to report bird sightings. The guide lists the 15 most relevant bird species with respect to aviation safety, and includes instructions for correct identification, information about flows/movements within the airport and details on the focal points of attraction identified in the environment.

online training

To develop wildlife risk management programmes, Aena requires the support of qualified staff with knowledge of the basic principles of wildlife management (habitat management, focal points of attraction, identification of species that pose a risk in the area, risk reduction or mitigation measures, etc.). To help in their training, Aena is preparing an online course to be given to staff involved in the operation, maintenance and management of its airports.

The course will provide basic and specific wildlife control training for staff in compliance with Commission Regulation (EU) No 139/2014 of 12 February 2014 laying down requirements and administrative procedures related to aerodromes pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The content of the course will be tailored to the requirements of Technical Instruction CSA-16-ITC-110 Wildlife Control (Training and competence testing programme) and GM3 ADR.OPS.B.020 Wildlife Control Training.

Monitoring and management of lagomorph populations

The presence of lagomorphs can cause various problems, from damage to infrastructure due to burrow digging to broken wiring or creating foreign object damage (FOD) due to animals being run over by vehicles or aircraft taxiing on the runway. These prey species can also themselves be a focal point of attraction for predatory species that pose a risk to operations, such as birds of prey. Standardised methodologies are currently being developed to monitor lagomorph populations where this wildlife group is identified as the protagonist of risk, and management plans are being implemented to adapt to the population dynamics of these species in order to reduce their density on the air side of airports. Other proposals include the capture of animals during periods of the year in which successful reproduction decreases, with the ultimate goal of causing a negative population trend; management of crops in airports that require it to reduce habitat suitability; management of burrows by ploughing; and new methods of capture when needed.

Ineco works on improving lagomorph monitoring and control systems at the affected airports. / PHOTO_ARTHUR CHAPMAN (FLICKR)

]]>
https://www.revistaitransporte.com/keeping-wildlife-at-bay-at-airports/feed/ 0
Budgets to finalize large projects https://www.revistaitransporte.com/realistic-budgets-to-finalize-large-projects/ https://www.revistaitransporte.com/realistic-budgets-to-finalize-large-projects/#respond Sat, 17 Jun 2017 10:46:46 +0000 http://www.revistaitransporte.com/?p=2680

The Ministry of Public Works has presented the budget for 2017, increasing the total by 3,336 billion Euros, or 24.2% in comparison with 2016.

The budget, which the Ministry describes as realistic, aims to protect the large projects that are underway, such as the Mediterranean Corridor and the high-speed railway network. In regard to roads, a large part of the budget will be allocated to upkeep and maintenance.

Connections to airports and ports will be improved and investment in air navigation systems and airports will be increased. These budgets are aimed at the real needs of the citizens, to improve the quality of life of the Spanish people and to guarantee the territorial backbone and social cohesion, contributing to economic development and job creation.

]]>
https://www.revistaitransporte.com/realistic-budgets-to-finalize-large-projects/feed/ 0